Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

This $800 laptop punches way above its weight

asus zenbook 14 q425 review 14q 05
Asus Zenbook 14 Q425
MSRP $1,050.00
“The Asus Zenbook 14 Q425 is the first Meteor Lake laptop that's both fast and efficient.”
  • Excellent build quality
  • Strong productivity performance
  • Robust battery life
  • Good keyboard and touchpad
  • OLED's usual colors and contrast
  • Display is only FHD+
  • Keyboard switches could be tighter

Asus makes the best laptops under $1,000. Rather than compromise in key areas like design, performance, and build quality, Asus’ Zenbooks tend to balance these attributes remarkably well.

The new Zenbook 14 Q425 is a great example of such a laptop. It checks all the boxes, offering Intel Meteor Lake chipsets and a great OLED display at a reasonable $800 starting price. At the same time, it’s a step down from the closely aligned Zenbook 14 OLED (UX3405) I reviewed earlier this year, which has a higher-resolution panel. Even so, the Zenbook 14 Q425, with its excellent battery life, remains an easy laptop to recommend at its lower price.

Specs and configurations

  Asus Zenbook 14 Q425
Dimensions 12.30 inches x 8.67 inches x 0.59 inches
Weight 2.82 pounds
Processor Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Graphics Intel Arc graphics
Display 14.0-inch 16:10 FHD+  (1920 x 1200) OLED touch, 60Hz
Storage 512GB SSD
Touch Yes
Ports 2 x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4
1 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1
1 x HDMI 2.1
1 x 3.5mm audio jack
Wireless Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3
Webcam 1080p with infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello
Operating system Windows 11
Battery 75 watt-hours

Asus offers two configurations of the Zenbook 14 Q. The Q415 model costs $800 with an Intel Core Ultra 5 125H chipset, 8GB of RAM, a 512GB SSD, and a 14-inch FHD+ OLED display. I reviewed the Q425 model, which costs $1,050 for a Core Ultra 7 155H, 16GB of RAM, and a 1TB SSD. The base model is $100 more than the 2023 Zenbook 14 OLED, which started at $700 with an AMD processor, but less than the $1,300 2024 Zenbook 14 OLED.

The entry-level model is a significant value for a fast 14-inch laptop with an OLED display. Only the 8GB of RAM gives me pause, although that’s enough for basic productivity tasks. The high-end model is an attractive option for anyone who needs more RAM and storage for their workflow.

You’ll spend $1,o99 for a base MacBook Air M3 that matches the Zenbook’s base configuration and $1,699 on a comparable MacBook Air at the Zenbook’s high end. The Dell XPS 14 is $1,799 for the same chipset, RAM, and storage, but with an IPS display. Upgrade to the higher-resolution OLED option, and you’ll spend an additional $300.


The Zenbook 14Q open on a table.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

Everything else aside, I’ve always been impressed with Asus’ build quality. Like most Asus laptops I’ve reviewed, the Zenbook 14 Q425’s aluminum chassis and lid resist all bending, flexing, or twisting. I have no idea how Asus manages to make a lid that’s as thin as the MacBook Air’s but doesn’t exhibit that laptop’s slight bendiness. The rest of the Zenbook feels just as solid. Even the hinge is equally well done, allowing the lid to be opened smoothly with one hand and keeping it in place.

The Zenbook 14 Q425 is also thin and light at 0.59 inches and 2.82 pounds. The MacBook Air is one of the thinnest laptops at just 0.44 inches, but it feels denser than the Zenbook at 2.7 pounds. Asus included reasonably thin display bezels, particularly along the sides, so the Zenbook 14 Q425 is also a small laptop, even with its 14-inch display. The MacBook Air is slightly less wide and deep, but it has a smaller 13.6-inch display. The Dell XPS 14 has the smallest display bezels around, and it’s still slightly thicker at 0.71 inches and heavier at 2.7 pounds.

Aesthetically, the Zenbook 14 Q425 offers a simpler design than some other recent options. The Asus geometric pattern on the lid is absent here, with a simple dark gray color scheme and a subdued Asus logo. The rest of the laptop shares the same color, with an attractive minimalist design that doesn’t stand out. The MacBook Air and XPS 14 are arguably more attractive laptops, with the Dell boasting a particularly ultramodern design when the lid is open. However, you won’t spend more on those laptops based on their aesthetics alone.

The keyboard of the Zenbook 14Q.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The Zenbook 14 Q425’s keyboard has large, comfortable keycaps, lots of key spacing, and light and snappy switches. I liked it quite a bit, although it falls behind the shallower Apple Magic Keyboard on the MacBook Air due mainly to the Zenbook’s switches seeming looser than I like. That’s a quibble, though. Typing this review on the Zenbook was quick and not the least bit fatiguing.

The mechanical touchpad is nicely sized and has button clicks that I found just the slightest bit noisy when pressed. I can’t wait until haptic touchpads make their way down to midrange laptops like the Zenbook 14 Q425. That’s one thing that more expensive options like the MacBook Air and XPS 14 offer.


Not every 14-inch laptop has great connectivity. The Dell XPS 14 is one example, offering only USB-C with Thunderbolt port and requiring dongles for legacy devices. The Zenbook 14 Q425 is different, with a mix of Thunderbolt 4 and legacy connections. It lacks an SD card reader, which is an unfortunate omission, but I’ve seen a few recent laptops that do the same.

Wireless connectivity isn’t the latest Wi-Fi 7, but Wi-Fi 6E, and Bluetooth 5.3 will meet mainstream needs for a few more years.

The webcam on the Zenbook 14Q.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The Zenbook 14 Q425 has a 1080p webcam with an infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello facial recognition and a physical privacy shutter. Asus builds in a few technologies to enhance videoconferencing quality, such as its AiSense ambient light sensor and 3D noise reduction.

As with all laptops using the Meteor Lake chipset with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), the Zenbook can speed up various tasks using Microsoft Studio Effects, such as background blue, eye contact, and automatic framing. Theoretically, the NPU performs these tasks more efficiently.

Performance and battery life

Asus Zenbook 14 Q425 rear view showing lid and logo.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The Zenbook 14 Q series can be purchased with either an Intel Core Ultra 5 125H or Core Ultra 7 155H chipset. Both are members of the 14th-gen Meteor Lake series, and they offer the aforementioned NPUs for on-device AI to go with new Low Power Efficient cores that promise better efficiency. Both are 28-watt chipsets, with the Core Ultra 5 125H offering 14 cores (four Performance, eight Efficient, and two Low Power Efficient) and 18 threads running at up to 4.5GHz and the Core Ultra 7 155H with 16 cores (six Performance, eight Efficient, and two Low Power Efficient) and 22 threads running at up to 4.8GHz.

I reviewed the latter, and it provided the same fast CPU performance as every other laptop sporting the same chipset. It’s as fast as the previous generation of 45-watt chips and can meet the most demanding productivity needs. While the fans spun up in performance mode, they were never too loud and the chassis and keyboard deck never got more than warm. We haven’t tested a Core Ultra 5 125H, but it should provide plenty of performance for productivity users.

The integrated Intel Arc graphics are about twice as fast as the earlier Intel Iris Xe, but that’s still about half as fast as entry-level discrete GPUs. So, the Zenbook 14 Q425 isn’t as impressive as a gaming laptop or creator’s workstation.

Geekbench 5
Cinebench R23
PCMark 10 Complete
Asus Zenbook 14 Q425
(Core Ultra 7 155H)
Bal: 1,693 / 10,983
Perf: 1,728 / 11,473
Bal: 97
Perf: 85
Bal: 1,706 / 8,684
Perf: 1,758 / 10,899
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12
(Core Ultra 7 155H)
Bal: 1,658 / 8,569
Perf: 1,698 / 9,726
Bal: 159
Perf: 108
Bal: 1,570 / 6,867
Perf: 1,625 / 10,365
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED 2024
(Core Ultra 7 155H)
Bal: 1,696 / 9,502
Perf: 1,703 / 12,246
Bal: 145
Perf: 88
Bal: 1,653 / 9,156
Perf: 1,635 / 12,130
HP Spectre x360 14
(Core Ultra 7 155H)
Bal: 1,696 / 9,502
Perf: 1,703 / 12,256
Bal: 111
Perf: N/A
Bal: 1,750 / 9,832
Perf: N/A
Lenovo Yoga 9i Gen 8 (Core i7-1360P) Bal: 1,843 / 8,814
Perf: 1,835 / 10,008
Bal: 122
Perf: 101
Bal: 1,846 / 8,779 Perf: 1,906 / 9,849 6,102
Asus Zenbook 14X OLED (Core i7-13700H) Bal: 1,848 / 11,157
Perf: 1,852 / 11,160
Bal: 84
Perf: 82
Bal: 1,819 / 11,066 Perf: 1,826 / 12,795 6,020
HP Pavilion Plus 14 2023
(Ryzen 7 7840U)
Bal: 1,819 / 9,655
Perf: N/A
Bal: 84
Perf: N/A
Bal: 1,721 / 12,234
Perf: N/A
Apple MacBook Air
Bal: 1,925 / 8,973
Perf: N/A
Bal: 151
Perf: N/A
Bal: 1,600 / 7,938
Perf: N/A

One thing I hoped to see from Meteor Lake was improved efficiency. So far, that hasn’t been the case with many laptops I’ve reviewed — but the Zenbook 14 Q425 is a step in the right direction.

The Zenbook benefits from a very large 75-watt-hour battery, which is a healthy capacity for a 14-inch laptop. While it has an OLED display, it’s also “just” FHD+ resolution, whereas some of its other midrange laptops have higher-res 2.8K panels. In our web-browsing test, which plays through a list of complex websites, it performed very well at roughly 12.5 hours. That’s well above the class average and competes strongly against AMD’s more efficient chips. And when looping our test video, the Zenbook 14 Q425 lasted for an impressive 18 hours.

That’s much better than the other Meteor Lake machines in the comparison group, including other Zenbooks, and it’s only significantly behind the industry-leading MacBook Air. You’ll get a full day’s work in productivity workflows and the usual web browsing, media consumption, and email tasks. That’s more like it.

Web browsing Video
Asus Zenbook 14 Q425
(Core Ultra 7 155H)
12 hours, 25 minutes 18 hours, 1 minute
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12
(Core Ultra 7 155H)
7 hours, 4 minutes 10 hours 30 minutes
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED 2024
(Core Ultra 7 155H)
7 hours, 9 minutes 14 hours, 22 minutes
Asus Zenbook 14X OLED
(Core i7-13700H)
8 hours, 2 minutes 10 hours, 49 minutes
HP Spectre x360 14
(Core Ultra 7 155H)
8 hours, 6 minutes 13 hours, 3 minutes
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED 2023
(Ryzen 5 7530U)
12 hours, 13 minutes 17 hours, 19 minutes
Lenovo Yoga 9i Gen 8
(Core i7-1360P)
7 hours, 41 minutes 13 hours, 25 minutes
Apple MacBook Air
(Apple M2)
17 hours, 59 minutes 21 hours, 9 minutes


Asus has been a leader in pushing OLED displays to lower-priced laptops, and that’s what we see here. However, some other 14-inch Zenbooks have had 2.8K (2880 x 1800) displays that are sharper than the Zenbook 14 Q425’s FHD+ (1920 x 1200) panel. And this one is limited to 60Hz, when the industry is shifting to 120Hz and faster.

However, I found the Zenbook 14 Q425 to sport a very nice display. I noticed some pixels while staring at text, but most people wouldn’t. According to my colorimeter, its colors were excellent at 100% of sRGB, 97% of AdobeRGB, and 100% of DCI-P3, with accuracy at a Delta-E of 0.90 (less than 1.0 is excellent). The contrast was also excellent, as usual, with inky blacks, and there’s enough brightness at 361 nits for anything but the best high dynamic range (HDR) performance.

I would have preferred a 120Hz refresh rate, but otherwise, this is an excellent display that will please productivity users and creators. The lower resolution and slower refresh rate likely contribute to the Zenbook 14 Q425’s great battery life, making them net benefits for most people.

The audio is provided by a pair of downward-firing “Super-linear” speakers that Asus says increase the diaphragm’s amplitude by 50% and volume by 2.25 times. They definitely get loud, but at full volume, there was considerable distortion and highs were way too bright. It sounded a lot better at around 50% volume, where distortion disappeared, while still being loud enough. The bass was even able to make an appearance, and dialogue sounded snappy. Now, the audio didn’t match the excellent system in the MacBook Pro, but it was certainly enjoyable for streaming YouTube and Netflix, which surprised me.

Not the best Asus option, but still very good

The Zenbook 14 Q425 is similar to some other Asus 14-inch laptops, but it’s not identical. It’s less expensive than the company’s other recent models and cuts a corner in display resolution.

But it shares the typical Asus build quality, has a very good keyboard and touchpad, and its battery life matches its excellent performance. If you’re looking for a 14-inch laptop that won’t break the bank, the Zenbook 14 Q425 comes recommended.

Editors' Recommendations

Mark Coppock
Mark has been a geek since MS-DOS gave way to Windows and the PalmPilot was a thing. He’s translated his love for…
This Windows laptop costs under $1,000 and handily beats the MacBook Air
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED rear view showing lid and logo.

The least expensive MacBook you can buy remains the MacBook Air M1, which Apple is keeping around in spite of a complete redesign with the MacBook Air M2. And there's good reason. The MacBook Air M1 is among the best laptops that sell for under $1,000.

But it's not the only great laptop for under $1,000. The Asus ZenBook 14 OLED is also a special machine, offering considerable value at a starting price of $700, including a luscious OLED display. As good as the MacBook Air is, the ZenBook 14 just might have it beat.

Read more
Yet another disappointment about Intel’s next chips may be true
Intel Core i3-12100F box sitting in front of a gaming computer.

Intel’s successor for its existing 13th-gen Raptor Lake desktop processors is expected to launch later this year, and as far as the rumors go, it's not going to be a particularly exciting release.

It's already reportedly going to be a fairly minor upgrade -- but now, counter to previous reports, a new piece of information suggests that Intel will continue using the same quad-core configuration for its Core i3 SKUs under the 14th-gen Raptor Lake Refresh series.

Read more
Intel’s next budget CPUs may finally be worth buying for gamers
Intel Core i5-13600K installed in a motherboard.

Intel is expected to introduce its new range of 14th-gen desktop processors later this year. While we don’t have a whole lot of official information yet, a new leak now suggests that one can expect a considerable boost in the core count for the cheaper processors in the lineup.

According to the information shared by Red Gaming Tech, Intel's upcoming 14th-gen range will be referred to as "Raptor Lake Refresh" instead of the previously rumored Meteor Lake series. The new 14th-gen range of CPUs is expected to feature the same architecture and core design as the existing 13th-gen Raptor Lake CPUs -- but with some minor tweaks.

Read more